Galim Khussainov
Inflation and the tengeBankingLending and mortgagesTaxationEconomy and public policyManagement

Taxation · 2 min read

Seasonal Diesel Excise: A One-Sided Approach

Translated from Russian with the help of AI. Original: Russian version

Why a seasonal increase in the diesel excise tax yields little benefit and fuels inflation, and why it would be more sensible to adopt the Russian model in full, folding the vehicle tax into the excise and differentiating rates by environmental class.

Kazakhstan plans to raise the excise tax on diesel fuel to KZT 9,300 per ton, a 17-fold increase. In fairness, it should be noted that a seasonal excise increase was already introduced last year. However, it came in just as winter began, when the excise was scheduled to fall under the resolution then in force, so almost no one noticed the increase. When the time came to raise the excise under that resolution, the increase was postponed until summer.

According to media reports, the main rationale for the increase is the need to equalize prices between Russia and Kazakhstan in border areas.

However, the issue has been approached, as usual, in a rather one-sided way. The tax systems of Russia and Kazakhstan differ substantially, and in practice such an increase will not bring great dividends. First, in Russia the vehicle tax is included in the excise. Second, the VAT rate in Russia is 1.5 times higher. Third, the quality of fuel in Russia is significantly higher.

Moreover, diesel is a socially significant product. It is used mainly in agriculture and mining, as fuel for vehicles and for diesel generators that produce electricity and heat.

A rise in diesel prices will naturally affect the cost of the goods produced. It will then pass down the chain into the main goods, works and services produced in Kazakhstan, driving up inflation in the country.

Another highly questionable factor is the seasonal nature of the excise. Setting seasonal rates will always cause volatility in diesel consumption and uneven demand in the periods when an excise change is planned. This will push prices up ahead of the increase and tie up a large amount of working capital. Because demand will exceed supply, intermediaries will raise diesel prices in anticipation, before the new excise takes effect.

Given the technological specifics of diesel production, volatile demand may lead to seasonal fuel shortages and lower consumption of Kazakhstani diesel. In periods of high consumption, shortages will be covered by imports of Russian fuel, so over the year as a whole, consumption of Kazakhstani fuel will decline.

A more sensible option in the current situation would be to adopt the Russian experience fully: fold the vehicle tax into the excise and differentiate the excise by environmental class. The more environmentally friendly the fuel, the lower the excise.

Published in: Facebook, 31 May 2017

More on this topic

The 2026 Budget After Seven Months: Where Revenues Really Fell Short

How a year-on-year comparison of the first seven months of 2026 with the same period of 2025, rather than a comparison with the plan, shows that tax revenues rose by 17%, and why the stronger tenge (484 per dollar versus 514), not the tax reform, explains most of the shortfall against plan. The reform did reduce local budget revenues, mainly through a lower personal income tax (PIT) burden, and shifted the tax base toward the national budget.

VAT Refunds for Agricultural Exporters

How a personalized VAT refund mechanism for agricultural exporters could address the current system, under which up to 80% of claimed VAT is effectively not reimbursed and large and small agricultural producers are put on unequal footing. The proposal would deny exporters a refund only for the VAT portion matching the producer's benefit (6.4% of turnover in the KZT 100 million example), rather than for all input VAT.

On the Construction Market

How the new Tax Code, including the VAT increase to 16% and the extension of VAT to apartments whose construction begins on or after January 1, 2026, will affect housing construction in Kazakhstan. It examines why the end of small-business tax breaks will raise construction costs, cut developers' net sale prices and profits, and pose risks for the regions, with the effect expected to be felt from 2027.