Kazakhstan's External Debt: 69% Is Tied to Subsoil Use
Translated from Russian with the help of AI. Original: Russian version
An analysis of the National Bank's external debt statistics shows that about 69% of the debt is linked to subsoil use rather than to manufacturing, with most of the "professional, scientific and technical activities" category apparently reflecting oil and gas project costs.
I have been reading the National Bank's report on the structure of Kazakhstan's external debt as of June 30, 2015.
Total debt stands at $155 billion. A further $13 billion still has to be repaid in the third and fourth quarters of this year. Incidentally, this is also a source of pressure on the tenge, at a time when the trade surplus has shrunk considerably.
But that is not what caught my attention. What caught my attention was the question of which sector is the most capital-intensive.
Mining: $11.7 billion
Manufacturing: $6.7 billion
- of which metallurgy accounts for $4 billion
- and oil refining and petrochemicals for $1.5 billion
Construction: $6.4 billion
Transportation and storage: $15.7 billion, of which $10.8 billion is pipelines
Financial sector: $13.4 billion
Public administration and defense: $7 billion
And now, ATTENTION:
PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES: $79.5 billion.
A country of scientific breakthroughs, I thought. But when I looked closely at the breakdown, I was taken aback:
of which:
Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis: $67.7 billion, of which:
- geological exploration and surveying: $67.3 billion
I wonder how geological exploration came to be classified as professional, scientific and technical activity, and even as architecture, engineering surveys, technical testing and analysis. And why do I have the feeling that this line reflects Kashagan and its costs? If it is Kashagan, then this is no longer exploration but preparation for production.
Well, let us set aside $67.7 billion from science and technical activities. That still leaves $11.8 billion, which is rather a lot for our economy: a full 5% of GDP (now already 7.5%).
And ATTENTION for the second time:
Activities of head offices; management consultancy: $11.4 billion.
Something tells me this, too, is connected with subsoil use and with the upkeep of Kashagan's management apparatus.
To get a clearer picture of how much of the investment shown here goes to subsoil users and to downstream stages of subsoil-related processing:
(11.7 + 4 + 1.5 + 10.8 + 67.3 + 11.4) / 155 = 68.8%
And what about manufacturing not connected with subsoil use? $6.7 billion − $5.5 billion = $1.2 billion.
1.2 / 155 = 0.77%
If you do not dig deeper, you could easily believe that foreign companies really do have faith in our innovative economy and are investing so much money in it.
Published in: Facebook, 9 October 2015